(skip table of contents)
- 1. Syntax
- 1.1. General questions
- 1.2. Structural questions
- 1.3. Coordination
- 1.4. Negation
- 1.5. Anaphora
- 1.6. Reflexives
- 1.6.1. By which of the following means is reflexivity expressed?
- 1.6.2. Is the scope of reflexivity restricted to the clause, i.e. must antecedent and reflexive element be in the same clause?
- 1.6.3. For intraclause reflexivity where the reflexive element is a verbal affix describe:
- 1.6.4. If the reflexive element is not a verbal affix, describe its positional possibilities within the clause. If the position of this element is not restricted to one place in the clause it may be simpler to answer this question in cobination with the following one.
- 1.6.5. If the reflexive element is not a verbal affix, can the following relations between antecedent and reflexive exist?
- 1.6.6. Can reflexive relations exist within nominalized clauses?
- 1.6.7. Can reflexive relations exist within ordinary noun phrases? Describe the possibilities.
- 1.6.8. Do reflexive structures occur without any overt antecedent, e.g. in nonfinite clauses, nominalizations, or ordinary noun phrases (e.g. Dutch het verhaal over zichzelf was spannend “the (my, your, etc.) story about myself, yourself, etc. was exciting”).
- 1.6.9. Do the reflexive forms have any other uses, e.g.
- 1.7. Reciprocals. Repeat the same questions as under reflexive (1.6)
- 1.8. Comparison
- 1.9. Equatives. Repeat the same questiosn as under comparatives (1.8)
- 1.10. Possession
- 1.11. Emphasis
- 1.12. Topic
- 1.13. Heavy Shift
- 1.14. Other movement processes
- 1.15. Minor sentence-types
- 1.16. Are there operational definitions for the following word-classes?
- 2. Morphology
- 3. Phonology
- 4. Ideophones and interjections
- 5. Lexicon
$Id: questionnaire.html 94 2007-05-05 19:34:41Z PNE $